PaulRobinson 3 hours ago

Feels like a project covering some of the same ground as task warrior [0], which I've used on and off over the years. The main thing I've appreciated is integration with various tools - I had access in both vimwiki and the macOS task bar for a while which was nice - but all these tools miss the key thing that stops me using them all the time: integration with tools on my phone. It's great having cli access to tasks and in other places, but without ubiquity, given the way I work, it might well just be another place that ideas of tasks I need to do go to die.

[0] https://taskwarrior.org

  • Aperocky 2 hours ago

    The biggest difference is that tascli supports records natively - you can use it to just record stuff. This is one of the main reason why I created it - I didn’t just want tasks, but also when I have anything notable to jot down.

    Other than that, I try to keep tascli as simple as possible so it can stay small and concise. Putting `tascli list task today` in zshrc is really nice to have a reminder everytime I open a new terminal tab.

modin 2 hours ago

Does it handle both recurring events and recurrence?

E.g. move the lawn every other week vs pay rent on the 17th every month. If I go a week overdue on rent I still need to pay the next on the 17th. If I go a week overdue on the lawn I don't need to mow again for two weeks, not one.

  • Aperocky 33 minutes ago

    For recurring tasks, the tool tracks the current interval and don't attempt to verify past intervals. Similar to past due single time tasks, they won't show unless you query specifically.

    One of the reason is complexity, the other is that I'd rather have this tool be helpful whenever invoked, vs. forcing users to remember to update yet another tool.

gcr 29 minutes ago

Also check out org-mode, which is emacs' own journaling and organization system!

fenaer 2 hours ago

Looks great but a configurable date format to support the European standards of dd/MM/yyy would turn it into something I could actualy use

  • Aperocky 17 minutes ago

    It does support YYYY/mm/dd which is the international standard.

    Curious - in Europe, do you do dd/mm/YYYY or dd.mm.YYYY? The latter should be straightforward to support, but former would conflict with mm/dd/YYYY that's already included.

globalnode 38 minutes ago

What I dont like about computer todo or task lists is that they kind of describe you pretty well to prying eyes. As a privacy enthusiast im not that keen on having that info get out, especially with recall and possibly multiple other ai agents running around in the background looking through my stuff. I dont know what the solution to this is and Im not sure Linux will be free from this either in the future. Perhaps a disconnected linux box purely for todo lists that i manually ssh into to get access to? (but that would then be connected, hmm... perhaps through a physical firewall intermediary?)

  • Aperocky 15 minutes ago

    It is local, the program use a sqlite db locally and does not talk to internet whatsoever.

    In that it's not necessarily different than writing your todolist on a notebook - someone other than you could have got hold of that and read it - say if it's on a shared shelve.

  • ravenical 25 minutes ago

    This argument also seems to apply to every other form of data about yourself. Once someone has access to your computer, I think the battle of preventing them from finding out about you is kinda over?

  • derrida 30 minutes ago

    if you're ultra paranoid and want a private OS to read / write - tails and set up a home directory on a thumbdrive