bobxmax 2 days ago

My feedback is that you should delete this and do something worthwhile rather than help propagate more machine-generated filth.

thebruce87m a day ago

Can someone fill me in on why the comments so far are highly critical? Is it the art style (looks familiar but don’t know much about it) or just the genAI aspect that people are tired of?

  • Piko a day ago

    Not sure if you're trolling, but there's a huge debate over exactly this kind of thing... e.g. see https://www.vox.com/artificial-intelligence/408786/ai-art-st...

    • jasfi a day ago

      Artists should be able to opt-out so the debate can be resolved. AFAIK they can.

      Also, Ghibli will likely benefit from the huge amount of publicity they've had with the AI image gen rush. It's the artists/studios that don't get named that would likely complain.

    • thebruce87m a day ago

      I’m not trolling, so it’s a copyright thing for the art style. From the comments it seemed to be something worse. Makes sense, thanks.

      • Klonoar a day ago

        It’s not just copyright, it’s the respect for the artist behind the style itself.

        Don’t boil it down to just corporate/legalese. What you’re seeing is a human reaction.

        • thebruce87m a day ago

          I wasn’t trying to reduce it, someone called it “filth” and someone else said they’d go to hell and so I wondered if it was something to do with an art style normally associated with prohibited material or something like that.

Piko a day ago

No, thank you. I'd rather have real artists create real art :)

Zardoz84 2 days ago

I think that should be a place in the hell for people creating this stuff and thinking that is a good thing.